Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Birth of indigenisation super minister

Birth of indigenisation super minister

09 March, 2011 06:43:00    VINCENT KAHIYA

IN May last year Public Service minister Eliphas Mukonoweshuro took umbrage 
at his MDC-T colleague Finance minister Tendai Biti’s announcement that 
government had frozen civil servants’ salaries.

His gripe was that the Finance minister was encroaching into his purview as 
Labour minister. He warned Biti that “government did not operate on the 
basis of super ministers”.

“All issues pertaining to the Ministry of Public Service, i.e., remuneration 
issues, conditions of service, human resources policy and management, etc, 
are the responsibility and central mandate of the responsible minister and 
no one else,” Mukonoweshuro said.

“This government does not operate on the basis of super ministers who may 
frequently arrogate to themselves responsibilities that are neither in their 
present province of competence nor designated mandate.”

There is perhaps no greater evidence of this arrogation of overarching 
powers by a minister than the influence that Indigenisation and Youth 
minister Saviour Kasukuwere is exerting across portfolios in the unity 

Biti’s actions, like those of any Finance minister, are bound to encroach 
into domains of other ministries. His colleagues, as was the case with 
Mukonoweshuro, can however publicly censure him for trespassing. Kasukuwere 
is however living a charmed life. Who in Zanu PF can publicly raise a finger 
against him at the moment?

He has become a super minister who currently has the nation in a spin as he 
throws his weight around, and in many an instance, literally.

This newfound power has been given impetus by President Robert Mugabe, 
constantly urging him to target certain firms for expropriation.

He now carries the President’s brief on the indigenisation project and isn’t 
he loving it; like a kid with a new toy.

His boisterous behaviour at a business dialogue organised by our sister 
paper the Zimbabwe Independent last year, was no flash in the pan. He is 
enjoying his place in the sun.

As the presidential wind blows under Kasukuwere’s wings, what is more than 
apparent is the power that the minister now wields in other portfolios 
including those that are held by his colleagues in Zanu PF.

He can decide investment policy and who invests in banking, mining, 
industry, farming, tourism and infrastructure development.

All these sectors are manned by whole ministers who now have Kasukuwere as 
an unseen guest at all meetings with potential investors.

His feverish behaviour however, we are told, is an agitation for equitable 
distribution of wealth.

But cynics like myself are worried whether with his newfound political 
power, Kasukuwere would achieve the desired goals of wealth distribution and 
at the same time ensure that the economy continues on the recovery path.

Political ambition and sweeping legislative power are not always the right 
ingredients to achieving prudent development in a country.

Kasukuwere’s political power is not just resident in the word of the 
President but also in the indigenisation law, which is laced with clauses 
that appear to have been crafted to transfer wealth to a specific group of 

The minister, under the law, is empowered to come up with a register of 
persons who are potential beneficiaries of controlling interests in 
non-indigenous businesses.

The law is silent on the criteria set out for the purpose of determining who 
ought to be entered on the database and who ought to be excluded.

Researcher Derek Matyszak, writing on the Idasa website, says: “The 
legislation merely provides that if the minister is satisfied that the 
application is made in good faith, the applicant shall be registered in the 

Does this not leave the minister with fairly broad discretionary powers as 
to who may be put forward as a participant in an indigenisation scheme?

That is not all. The law also gives the minister what Matyszak refers to as 
“unfettered discretion to decide whether to approve or reject an 
indigenisation plan or to attach conditions to such a plan”.

Matyszak adds: “This arrangement leaves the possibility of plans being 
accepted or rejected on the basis of who — rather than what — is proposed in 
the indigenisation plan. Rejection may be based upon the extent to which the 
terms of indigenisation are beneficial to the person identified as a partner 
rather than whether they meet the criteria set out in the Act.

Although the exercise of the discretion ought to depend upon compliance with 
legislated indigenisation requirements, cronyism and corruption in this 
regard will be extremely difficult to prove or prevent.

“By placing the procedure in the hands of the minister rather than the board 
and by giving the minister such a broad discretion, the legislation thus 
appears purposely designed to allow the minister the possibility of 
compelling, against the threat of rejection of an indigenisation plan, the 
inclusion of selected individuals identified by the minister in 
indigenisation plans and the inclusion of such persons only on terms which 
the minister deems sufficiently beneficial. Oddly, and significantly, no 
appeal lies against a ministerial decision to reject an indigenisation plan 
other than in limited specified circumstances.”

The rejection of indigenisation plans has already started.

The jury is still out on whether the rejections have anything to do with 
political patronage.

What’s fundamental though is that Kasukuwere as a super minister needs to 
tread with caution in the employment of the power in his grasp.

His peers cannot challenge him lest they are accused of rebelling against 
the executive.

The MDC side of the unity government is usually dismissed as insidious 
elements who have always opposed President Mugabe’s empowerment policies.

On two key moments lately, President Mugabe has openly urged Kasukuwere to 
unleash the indigenisation project on select firms.

This is usually all one needs to be a super minister: Mugabe’s word.

As he exercises the presidential will, he should be mindful of history.

A number of his colleagues in government have travelled this road before.

Jonathan Moyo, Joseph Made, Didymus Mutasa and RBZ governor Gideon Gono have 
at some point in their lives earned this uncanny distinction of supermen.

It lasted as long as their principal allowed them to bask in the glory.

There is a game President Mugabe plays very effectively. It is disempowering 
one group to empower his man of the moment. – This article was first 
published in the NewsDay


Govt amends Indigenisation Act

Govt amends Indigenisation Act | The Chronicle   Minister Patrick Chinamasa Oliver Kazunga, Senior Business ReporterGOVERNMENT has amended the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Act in line

Read More »

Govt, BAT in agric empowerment drive

Govt, BAT in agric empowerment drive February 9, 2017 Features, Opinion & Analysis Sydney Kawadza Senior Features WriterIn 1995, Laxer Matemayi completed her Ordinary Level education

Read More »

Joint Venture Act gazetted

Joint Venture Act gazetted June 1, 2016 Business Martin Kadzere : Senior Business Reporter THE Joint Venture Act, expected to promote major investment across economic sectors, came

Read More »

New Posts:

From the archives

Posts from our archive you may find interesting