Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Sustainable solution to resuscitate Zimbabwe’s Agriculture

Sustainable solution to resuscitate Zimbabwe’s Agriculture

http://www.bulawayo24.com/

by Dr Vincent Gwarazimba
2011 November 23 17:06:32

ADAMAWA – Zimbabwe’s agriculture is currently facing serious challenges of 
productivity. In recent years, productivity has declined drastically and the 
country is unable to feed itself. The reasons for the collapse of 
productivity are varied and both agricultural experts and politicians blame 
the failure of the sector on politics. While politics has indeed played a 
significant in the demise of the sector, there are other contributing 
factors.

The unplanned and chaotic land reform is sometimes blamed for food shortages 
but that may not be the case because maize being the staple crop, 80% of the 
crop had always been produced by small holder rural farmers. Displaced white 
commercial farmers were critical to the sector for export crops such as 
tobacco and horticulture and indeed quality beef for the export market.

Therefore the current challenges must be blamed on first, government policy 
on the sector. Several policy frameworks on agriculture have been announced 
over a period of 10 years but these have had little impact because they were 
politically motivated, emotionally enacted as justification of a runaway 
land reform process. The policy frameworks lacked content and specifics on 
investment and role of parastatals in driving home the need to maintain or 
increase productivity of the sector.

The policy frameworks also lacked technical support, processes and systems 
to support implementation.  The frameworks lacked alternatives and options 
in the light of climate change and subsequent change in weather patterns.The 
sector also faces challenges of technical expertise.

Agricultural experts have left the country due to lack of motivation and 
lack of acknowledgement for their contribution. Indeed Zimbabwe at one time 
had the best organized extension and research services in Africa, but 
underfunding and political interference caused collapse of these services. 
There is unfortunate belief that free inputs can help resuscitate the 
sector. That is wrong thinking. Free inputs will not sustain the sector. 
Malawi is an example where input subsidy was too expensive for the 
government and relied heavily on donor support. When donors pulled the plug, 
the sector is now on course to collapse.

Sustainable Solution to Resuscitation of the Sector

There is indeed no silver bullet to resuscitation of the sector but the 
country needs to address the sector as follows;

Policy- Government policy on the sector must correct, organized and specific 
on delivery of services and support of systems. The role of government in 
the sector, providing a sustainable and suitable environment for investment 
in the sector should be clearly defined. Zimbabwe must not only look at and 
rely on foreign direct investment in the sector but creating an environment 
that creates, develops and support local investors. Even villagers can be 
investors if the policies promote and support their interests.

The problem is government has not invested in gathering information on:

a) the driving forces behind  small holder farming
b) the interests of the small holder
c) the motivation of the small holder farmer
d) expectations of this farmer
e) internal and external constraints on the small holder farmer
f) infrastructural challenges facing the farmer and indeed
g) understanding the national, regional and international commodity markets 
relative to the capacity of rural communities to produce quality 
commodities.

Information on these will enable government to formulate a policy framework 
supportive of small holder farming and budget for investment in these 
farmers.

Capacity building of rural farming communities. Much of the say is about 
free inputs from the Grain Marketing Board. That is not capacity building. 
It is not sustainable. Solution is on empowerment in the sector. Provide 
farmers with investment tools in the form of transferable Certificate of 
Ownership (COOs) on land to enable farmers to access finance.

99 year lease agreements are not a silver bullet in this case but a villager 
in Chibi depositing an ownership certificate with an agricultural finance 
bank and get money for inputs, land preparation and even labor depending on 
the size of the land. This will create value for land and make the farmer 
understand and appreciate protection of the land as own for future 
generations. Land must be converted into an asset for rural communities. It 
must be tradable, exchangeable and protectable and viewed as source of 
investment.

Enabling technical support for the small holder farmer will go a long way to 
sustain productivity. Until late 1999s when the Department of Agricultural 
Extension (Agritex) was dismembered by misguided policies, technical support 
was effective, enabling farmer training programs and motivating farmers into 
competitive mode of agricultural production. Indeed then the farmers were 
receptive to training and desired to be part of growing population of 
successful small holder farmers.

While the government was at hand to proffer support, small holder farmers 
were equally enthusiastic to make food production successful. Now the new 
and young farmers on the land are untrained and technically unqualified to 
undertake and manage agricultural operations and more so they live on get 
rich quick mentality through deals which sometimes don’t succeed and farmer 
ends up selling inputs to make up. Hence it is time government invests 
heavily in training of young farmers and providing resources to Agritex to 
provide technical support on a daily basis. New farmers must be kept 
conscious of their responsibilities to the nation as long as they occupy 
productive land.

Farmer responsibility to the nation. Much of the current farmer mentality is 
self-enrichment at the expense of the nation. Farming is indeed a business 
and must be viewed so but must be undertaken with responsibility to provide 
nation with sustainable food security. If a farm is suitable for and had 
history of maize production, why then change to capital intensive tobacco 
which often fails due to lack of finance. Government must promote sense of 
responsibility to the nation and farmers must be encouraged to take farming 
as serious business within the context of serving the nation.

Lack of adequate and suitable infrastructure is one of the major constraints 
in resuscitating Zimbabwe agriculture. Taking cognizance of small holder 
farmers as key stakeholders in the business of food production and supply, 
most of the farming areas are inaccessible due to lack of or dilapidated 
infrastructure. Thus roads no longer exist because of years of neglect. To 
make an immediate difference on farming, roads must be rebuilt or improved 
to increase farmer access to inputs and markets. Domboshava and Mutoko are 
able to supply Harare with much needed vegetable because of better roads and 
services.

Supporting and training of technical staff. Research and Agritex staff 
require support to motivate and drive them into supporting farmers. There 
are many ways of doing this. It is not about salaries but providing support 
in the form of vehicle loans payable over a period of time. Previously 
Agritex officers used to get brand new single cab trucks to enable to access 
areas remote. Motor bikes will also make a difference.

Thus budget to the Ministry of Agriculture must be inclusive of such 
vehicles on an annual basis. The technical neglect of the agriculture has 
also led to decline in quality of human resources. This requires government 
to recapitalize institutions like Chibero, Gwebi, Mlezu, Esighodini and 
others and increase capacity and quality.

Agricultural and Rural Development Authority (ARDA) and Cold Storage Company 
(CSC). Much has been said about these organizations failing to fulfill their 
national responsibilities of augmenting food supplies. These two 
organisations are endowed with land resources but have over the years 
declined into money wasting monoliths due to neglect by government and 
mismanagement by incompetent staff.

While there are calls for their privatization that probably is not the 
solution but take on board a public/private sector arrangement or contract 
management and let the private sector run the institutions for and on behalf 
of government. With government providing a limited guarantee of loans 
acquired from banks and/or with involvement of banks in driving the nation 
towards a definite goal, CSC and ARDA could make an impact on food security 
of the nation.

Financial institutions are currently risk averse when it comes to supporting 
farmers, especially small holder farmers. This is happening across Africa 
and this has resulted in Africa being food insecure. Indeed the banks have 
lost confidence in agriculture as a business but it is government policy 
that creates and motivates desire for investment in the sector.

Perhaps one way of doing this is to have a policy backed by legal framework 
that works towards cooperation between government and banks in providing 
financial support to small holder farmers with tacit support and involvement 
of Agritex. Then Agritex must play a leading role through an Agritex-linked 
agricultural development limited government/private sector company 
government and banks.

Commodity pricing is also a major factor in food production. Previously, 
honest pre-season commodity price announcement promoted maize production. 
While this has happened in the last few years, however, government did not 
have money to pay for the produce. There is need to develop an honest 
culture of does business with farmers and government must take 
responsibilities having retained the ownership of the Grain Marketing Board.

To make a difference government and private sector must come into position 
on making the GMB, an institution responsible for food security but 
answerable to both government and private investors. There is money in food 
and the private sector has the desire to access the many food storage 
facilities in the countries in partnership with government.

Agricultural Investment Commission. To oversee and promote investment in the 
sector. The commission to support and work with small holder farmers, 
working with and in support of Agritex, financial institutions towards 
creating commodity market dynamics based on internal and external forces.

Leading markets reviews and guiding policy formulation, working with 
agricultural establishments for effective and productive use of resources 
towards a sustainable market structure and food security. A commission based 
on both government and private sector fostering partnership in developing 
the sector.

—————————-
DR Vincent Gwarazimba, Senior Agricultural Consultant, Adamawa Agricultural 
Development and Investment Limited (AADIL), Adamawa State Government, 
NIGERIA. Email [email protected] Phone  +2348093143032 .

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

New Posts: