Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

‘Extraordinary’ twist in SA, Zim torture trial

‘Extraordinary’ twist in SA, Zim torture trial

http://www.swradioafrica.com

By Alex Bell
26 March 2012

There’s been what has been described as an ‘extraordinary’ twist in a 
landmark court case in South Africa, which will urge the authorities there 
to investigate and prosecute high level Zimbabwean officials accused of 
crimes against humanity.

The case, filed by the Southern African Litigation Centre (SALC) and the 
South Africa based Zimbabwe Exiles Forum was meant to get underway on 
Monday. The groups are asking the High Court to review and set aside a 
decision made by South Africa’s National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and the 
police not to investigate Zimbabwean officials linked to acts of 
state-sanctioned torture. This followed a police raid on the headquarters of 
the MDC in 2007.

But the start of the case was postponed to Tuesday after “stunning” new 
testimony from one of the key respondents. Anton Ackermann, the head of the 
NPA’s Priority Crimes Litigation Unit, last week lodged his testimony before 
the court – indicating that he had recommended an investigation, had 
disagreed with the police’s reasons for not pursuing the case and had been 
“manipulated and misled” by both his colleagues within the NPA and the State’s 
Advocate.

“The contents of Ackermann’s affidavit cast serious doubt over the reasons 
that the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Police Commissioner gave 
for not initiating an investigation into these crimes against humanity,” 
said Nicole Fritz, Executive Director of SALC.

Fritz told SW Radio Africa that Ackermann’s new testimony “also calls into 
question the very independence and impartiality of the NPA and its 
prosecutors.”

“Ackermann is in law responsible for the management and direction of 
investigations and prosecutions of international crimes and he was the 
original recipient of SALC’s request to initiate an investigation. According 
to his sworn testimony, he called for a docket to be opened, SALC to be 
consulted, the Priority Crimes Unit to be approached for guidance and for 
the docket to be submitted to the NPA for a final decision. None of these 
recommendations were followed,” Fritz said.

Fritz also explained that Ackermann’s new evidence demonstrates “his 
attempts to provide his version of events were met with persistent 
resistance on the part of his colleagues, and even threats.”

In correspondence between Ackermann and the State Advocate Christopher 
Macadam, Ackermann was warned to “very carefully and seriously consider the 
implications of including a statement that you were not satisfied… which has 
very important consequences for both the Applicants and the Respondents. I 
also believe that the court would be required to make findings on your 
ethical conduct which could result in further action being taken against 
you.”

Fritz meanwhile applauded Ackermann’s decision to come forward with this 
testimony because of the precedence it sets for the rule of law in South 
Africa. But she warned that Ackermann could now be “punished” for coming 
forward.

“It is prosecutors such as Ackermann that inspire confidence in the justice 
system and the rule of law so we really hope this does not happen and the 
NPA proceeds properly in dealing with this,” Fritz said.

The case will now get underway on Tuesday.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Killer poacher jailed 18 years

Killer poacher jailed 18 years   3/7/2019 The Chronicle Mashudu Netsianda, Senior Court Reporter A POACHER who ganged up with a colleague and fatally attacked a

Read More »

New Posts:

From the archives

Posts from our archive you may find interesting