Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Zim faces food crisis

Zim faces food crisis

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/

May 24, 2013 in Business

THIRTEEN years after its fast track land reform programme, Zimbabwe is still 
importing most of its food and is far from regaining its breadbasket status.

Report by Taurai Mangudhla

Analysts have said the discordant land tenure system ushered in after the 
reforms remains an albatross around the economy’s neck.

However, President Robert Mugabe appears to ignore that the country needs a 
deep relook at land resettlement and the resultant unclear land tenure 
system before any attempts to revive farming sustainably can bear fruit.

At the official launch of the country’s Food and Nutrition Security Policy 
last week, Mugabe said implementation of the land reform programme has 
become the cornerstone of ensuring food and nutrition security as the 
majority of people now have access to agricultural land.

However, analysts, critics and most in the agriculture industry feel 
otherwise, with Commercial Farmers Union president Charles Taffs saying a 
comprehensive approach that tackles pertinent issues in respect of land 
reform and a way forward is the solution to Zimbabwe’s agricultural crisis.

“The fundamentals to enable sustainable crop production are just not there,” 
Taffs said.

“Why do we keep skirting the issues, we need to sit down and say what has 
happened has happened and what can be corrected will be corrected, and once 
we do that, all the things like manufacturing will naturally fall into 
place,” he added.

According to CFU statistics, the fast track land reform programme, that 
displaced most of the 4 500 white commercial farmers, had contributed to the 
low agricultural output on the farms today.

CFU immediate past president Deon Theron is on record as saying the land 
grabbing and subsequent displacement of productive farmers had heavily 
weighed the economy down, costing the country an estimated US$12 billion as 
at the end of 2011.

Theron said the figure was reached after considering farm production before 
and after the land grab as well as projected foregone production.

He said the economic loss was worsened because resettled farmers had to 
re-equip the farms by buying new machinery and other capital equipment to 
replace vandalised assets.

Theron said Zimbabwe’s total agricultural output in 2000 was 4,3 million 
tonnes valued at about US$3,5 billion, but this had plunged by 73% in 2011.

Economist John Robertson argues Zimbabwe will only have a real shot at 
resuscitating its agricultural sector if it relooks at the land reform and 
land tenure system. Robertson said new farmers were struggling to expand 
their business as they had no access to lending facilities from banks, which 
required collateral.

Financial institutions have long said they cannot use the 100-year land 
leases given to farmers by government as collateral.

“We need a system that actually assists farmers get lines of credit and the 
best system which has been used all over the world is to use the land which 
you own and are working on as collateral,” he said.
“Unfortunately, government is saying, ‘we won’t go back to the issue of land 
tenure’, but that’s the model that actually works and anything else doesn’t,” 
Robertson said.

He added: “ There is no need to put water in your petrol tank because you 
know that doesn’t work.”

The economist argued a food and nutrition policy alone was not enough to 
turn the country’s agriculture around.

He said a host of policies that promote employment creation and industry 
growth should accompany the policy.

“That one policy cannot solve all our problems, and food security and 
poverty problems need policies that create employment. Policies like the 
Indigenisation Act are not supportive of this, because more than anything, 
indigenisation actually kills jobs,” added Robertson.

He said Zimbabwe should also adopt genetically modified organisms (GMO) to 
compete on an equal footing with the global market.

Robertson’s argument is in line with the World Banks’ submission that the 
country should allow farmers to grow GMO food and cash crops to greatly 
enhance its yields and international competitiveness. In its Zimbabwe Growth 
Recovery Notes on Agriculture, the World Bank said the move would reduce 
pesticide costs and the rate of pesticide poisoning.

Bulawayo based economic analyst Eric Bloch said while the policy was silent 
on land tenure, it could be mitigated by provisions in the new constitution 
which will allow the 99-year land leases to act as security.

“It is a positive development that the 99-year leases can be negotiable and 
used as security,” Bloch said, adding other critical enablers needed to be 
addressed.

“Even if the leases will be used to access loans, financial institutions do 
need money to lend so we need a general economic turn-around,” he added.

“Government should also ensure agricultural production is driven by market 
forces so that farers get fair prices.”

Bloch’s call for an economic turnaround to enable banks to give funding to 
farmers follows Bankers’ Association of Zimbabwe vice-president Sam Malaba’s 
pronouncements last week that the banking sector is unable to provide 
adequate funds to support agricultural production due to lack of long-term 
lines of credit.

At the official launch of the Food and Nutrition Security Policy, Malaba 
said the total deposits in the banking sector last week were about $3,8 
billion, with as much as 87% being short-term transitory deposits.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

New Posts:

From the archives

Posts from our archive you may find interesting