Are Zimbabwe’s new farmers winning, 10 years on?

By Martin Plaut World Service Africa editor

In 2000, President Robert Mugabe launched Zimbabwe’s controversial fast-track land reforms, seizing the majority of the 4,500 farms held by mostly white commercial farmers. More than a decade on, while some of the new farmers are doing well, others have found that if they cross the ruling party, they face losing their new land.

Shadrack Rwafa stands outside the home he has built.

He is one of Zimbabwe’s 170,000 new farmers, the proud owner of Land Hunger Farm.

A short, muscular man, he has worked hard to grow crops on this dry, unforgiving soil, which used to be a cattle ranch.

It took two months just to dig the well, and he is proud of the clean, fresh water it produces.

“It’s like milk,” he tells the BBC.

Mr Rwafa is no ordinary farmer.

He is a war veteran who fought against the white minority rule which ended in 1980, when Robert Mugabe replaced Ian Smith as the country’s leader.

In the intervening years he has been a sculptor, painter and miner.

But after Mr Mugabe inaugurated the Fast Track Land Reform Programme in 2000, Mr Rwafa saw his chance.

‘Life-long dream’

He joined the invasion of a white-owned farm in the area in the south-east of the country.

Many of the commercial farms were seized violently, but Mr Rwafa says his case was different.

“We didn’t just come without talking to the then farm owner.

“We asked ‘can we share the land’ and that’s how we came here,” says Mr Rwafa.

“He accepted and there was no violence at this place.

“We even helped him to put his sheep on the truck and he left us some fertilizers and we parted nicely.”

The farm is the fulfilment of his life-long dream.

Today he grows peanuts, beans and maize and says his life has improved dramatically.

A ranch that once raised cattle has been split into 252 separate units, each farmed by a family growing a range of crops as well as raising some cattle.

Mr Rwafa says it is far more productive than it was when it was commercially farmed.

The farm’s former owner was not available for comment.

The progress of Mr Rwafa and his fellow new farmers in Masvingo Province has been recorded by a , conducted by the Institute of Development Studies at Sussex University, which followed 400 new farmers.

It is one of a number of studies which challenge popular perceptions that Zimbabwe’s land reform programme has been an unmitigated disaster.

The Sussex University study does, however, accept that the process has had setbacks.

Only just over a third of the new farmers are doing well, about a fifth are supplementing their income by other means, and the rest are struggling, are not using the land for active production, or have given up altogether.

Even this sober view is challenged.

Economic consultant John Robertson suggests that agricultural output is only around 50% of the level it was before the land invasions began in 2000.

“Most of the new people involved who are farming the land that was confiscated from the large-scale farmers are producing enough for themselves and not much more,” says Mr Robertson.

Land invasions have not ended.

Just as we were visiting new farmers like Mr Rwafa, a white farmer lost the land he was born on.

Political patronage

He did not want his name to be mentioned – the whole issue is too politically sensitive – but he seemed almost resigned to what had taken place.

“You didn’t have to be a genius to work out that we weren’t going to be there for the rest of our lives.

“One supposes they could stop it now, but I think they do not want to see a white on the land, and don’t need to see any whites left,” he says, more in sorrow than anger.

Mr Robertson believes the entire land redistribution exercise was meant to create a system of patronage, through a pool of voters who were dependent on the ruling Zanu-PF party.

“If you display your loyalty to the ruling party, you will get a free piece of land. If you show any disloyalty to the party, guess what… you’ll lose it,” he says.

Not even high-ranking Zanu-PF members are necessarily secure.

Tracy Mutinhiri was deputy minister of labour and social welfare until the middle of this year. She was also a beneficiary of land reform, with one of the biggest farms in the country.

Then she began to get too close to the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), the former opposition, which is now in an uneasy government of national unity with President Mugabe’s party.

“When we got into the inclusive government, I wanted to work with everybody. That’s how it started: building up and building up, and then one day they decided to come and invade my farm,” says Ms Mutinhiri.

“If it could happen to me, it could happen to anybody else,” she adds.

Many were seen as potential MDC supporters, and were therefore not allocated any of the redistributed land.

I spoke to some of these workers who were too fearful to be named.

“Sometimes we are getting by on just $10 (£6.40) a month,” says one woman, a former farm worker, now living in a disused tobacco barn.

The farm workers’ official minimum wage is $44 (£28.80) per month.

“We are really suffering, and we don’t know how we’re going to live.

“This land reform must be reversed, and maybe our life can change.”

President Mugabe’s land reforms have had a mixed outcome, with at least as many farm workers losing their livelihoods as there are new farmers working their own land.

The country is also now a net food importer where it once exported grain to the region.