Farmers seek Tribunal ruling on compensation
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by Clara Smith Thursday 11 February 2010
HARARE – Zimbabwe’s embattled white commercial farmers will ask the SADC Tribunal to set guidelines on calculation of compensation due to farmers for land lost under President Robert Mugabe’s farm redistribution programme that the regional court has ruled illegal.
The Southern African Commercial Farmers Union (SACFA), fighting for the rights of commercial farmers mainly from South Africa and Zimbabwe, said the South African Development Community should set guidelines of what constitutes fair compensation and how it should be calculated.
“We are going back to the SADC Tribunal asking what fair compensation is if we have lost everything taken from us,” SACFA official Dave Connoly told more than 100 farmers in Harare last week.
He added: “What is it (fair compensation) in monetary terms can be regarded as fair compensation. The initial SADC ruling gives us legal title to land and therefore a right to compensation. The Tribunal should decide the method of valuation.”
In a November 2008 ruling on an application brought by 79 white Zimbabwean farmers facing seizure of the farms under Mugabe’s land reforms, the Tribunal declared the Zimbabwean leader’s farm reforms discriminatory, racist and illegal under the SADC Treaty.
The regional court barred Harare from seizing land from the 79 farmers and to compensate those whose properties it had already taken.
Mugabe has Tribunal ruling as “nonsense and of no consequence” while his supporters have continued to seize more land owned by the white farmers who are protected by the judgment.
A Harare High Court judge a fortnight ago dismissed an application by white farmers to have the Tribunal ruling registered – and pave way for its enforcement in Zimbabwe – saying enforcing the regional court’s judgment would be against public policy in the country.
There is clearly little hope the Tribunal rulings will be upheld by the present government in Zimbabwe which remains dominated by Mugabe despite the veteran leader agreeing to cede some of his powers to Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai in a power-sharing agreement that gave birth to their unity government last February.
But more Tribunal rulings are likely to be more useful in the future when and if political power changes hands in Harare.
Mugabe’s decade-long farm invasions that the President says were necessary to ensure blacks also had access to arable land that they were denied by previous white-led governments have been blamed for plunging Zimbabwe into food shortages.
Once a net food exporter Zimbabwe has avoided mass starvation over the past decade only because international relief agencies were quick to chip in with food handouts. Mugabe denies his farm redistribution policies are to blame for hunger.
The Zimbabwean leader instead claims food shortages were a because of erratic weather and economic sabotage by his Western enemies that he says crippled the economy’s capacity to produce key inputs such as seed and
fertilizers . – ZimOnline