Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Karori Case HC 824/07

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE                                         CASE NO. HC 824/07HELD AT HARARE In the matter between KARORI (PRIVATE) LIMITED                                                            FIRST APPLICANT and  CHARLES INGRAM LOCK                                                            SECOND APPLICANT  and BRIGADIER MUJAJI                                                                                              RESPONDENT Before the Honourable Justice Kudya                       in ChambersThis 23rd day of February 2007  Mr Colegrave of Advocates Chambers and with him Mr Masterson for the ApplicantsMr T K Hove for the Respondent Having perused the papers filed of record and considered the representations of legal practitioners representing the parties,   IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 1.         The Respondent, his family workers and agents are hereby ordered to return to the Applicants the keys and locks to all sheds, barns, workshops, residences and pump houses pertaining to the buildings on the 376 hectare piece of land occupied by the Applicants in the headlands area of the Makoni District (which land is hereinafter called “the Farm”). 2.         The Respondent, his family, workers and agents are hereby ordered to restore Tsitsi Musariri and her children to occupation of the house from which she has been evicted. 3.         The Respondent, his family, workers and agents are hereby ordered to remove all farming equipment and materials that they have on that farm. 4.         The Respondent shall forthwith secure the removal from the land of all military personnel presently stationed there together with their tents and belongings. 5.         The Respondent, his family, workers and agents are hereby interdicted and prohibited from occupying or entering upon the Farm and from utilising or occupying any improvements thereon.  6.         The Respondent shall likewise make no attempt to cultivate, plant or introduce farming equipment or materials onto the farm and is hereby interdicted and prohibited from interfering in any way with the Applicants’ farming operations on that land or with the Applicants’ workers or agents. 7.         The respondent shall make no further attempt to occupy or utilise any equipment and materials belonging to the Applicants on any part of the Farm or any improvements thereon, either directly or indirectly and he shall not attempt to restrain or control the movement of any person or property onto or off the farm unless and until the Applicants are lawfully evicted from the Farm. 8.         The respondent shall pay the costs of this Application   23rd February 2007               BY THE COURT     REGISTRAR

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

New Posts: