Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Zim can fight farmers ruling

Zim can fight farmers ruling

http://www.citizen.co.za

Although a costs order of less than R200 000 was at stake, Judge Claassen 
said the case was important as it involved various issues in international 
relations.

15 September 2011 | ILSE DE LANGE

The Zimbabwe government was yesterday given leave to appeal against a North 
Gauteng High Court ruling in favour of dispossessed Zimbabwean farmers, 
despite being accused of coming to court with “hands dripping in blood”.

Judge Roger Claassen, who earlier refused the Zimbabwe government’s 
application to set aside three rulings in favour of the farmers, yesterday 
granted that government leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal 
against his ruling.

Although a costs order of less than R200 000 was at stake, Judge Claassen 
said the case was important as it involved various issues regarding 
international relations.

He said it was possible that a higher court could have a different take on 
the issues. Willie Spies argued on behalf of civil rights organisation 
AfriForum, which assisted three of the dispossessed farmers, that the 
Zimbabwe government did not come to court with clean hands, but “with hands 
dripping with the blood of people who were being actively persecuted”.
He said one of the farmers involved, Mike Campbell, had already died as a 
result of the injuries he sustained.

Spies pointed out that numerous judges in various courts had already ruled 
in favour of the farmers, adding that it was unlikely that the Appeal Court 
would intervene in a case revolving around a cost order of less than R200 
000.

Judge Claassen ruled in favour of the farmers in June this year that writs 
issued by the court for the seizure of Zimbabwean assets in South Africa 
could not be attacked on any grounds.

He also ruled that the High Court had the jurisdiction to register rulings 
by a Southern African Development Community Tribunal that Zimbabwe’s land 
reform programme was racist and unlawful and that the farmers should have 
been compensated for their losses.

AfriForum assisted three of the dispossessed farmers, Louis Fick, Richard 
Etheredge and the late Mike Campbell, to have the SADC ruling registered in 
a South African court and seize local properties owned by the Zimbabwean 
government.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

SA’s Zimbabwe interests secured

SA’s Zimbabwe interests secured http://www.iol.co.za October 31 2012 at 10:53am South Africa’s economic interests and investments in Zimbabwe would remain protected, Zimbabwean Foreign Affairs Minister Simbarashe

Read More »

Zuma to caution Mugabe

Zuma to caution Mugabe http://www.financialgazette.co.zw Friday, 09 March 2012 11:33 Clemence Manyukwe, Political Editor SOUTH African President Jacob Zuma is expected to caution President Robert Mugabe

Read More »

Investment roadshow set for SA

Investment roadshow set for SA Wednesday, 08 February 2012 00:00 Business Reporter A high-powered business delegation will early next month embark on a roadshow in

Read More »

SA envoy breaks mould on invasions

SA envoy breaks mould on invasions http://www.theindependent.co.zw/ Thursday, 27 October 2011 18:31 Vincent Kahiya SOUTH African Ambassador to Zimbabwe Vusi Mavimbela (pictured) has sought to break

Read More »

New Posts:

From the archives

Posts from our archive you may find interesting