Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

2012 winter wheat doomed

2012 winter wheat doomed

http://www.financialgazette.co.zw/

Friday, 22 June 2012 10:16

Nelson Chenga, Staff Reporter

NORTON — The land, tinted by browning vegetation stretches far and wide. 
Huge swathes of maize fields are yet to be reaped, two months past harvest 
time. Further afield, even more vast expanses of land lie fallow. An odd 
green patch here and there breaks the tanned panorama, completing a snapshot 
of Zim-babwe’s prime farming area of Norton.
Traditionally, at this time of the year, much of the land in this part of 
the country was lush. Watered by sprinklers and pivots, young wheat shoots 
should be flourishing as winter sets in. However, the prevailing scenery 
tells a different story, a tale which starkly points to the country’s doomed 
winter wheat cropping season yet. This, to a large extent, epitomises the 
demise of Zim-babwe’s agricultural sector.
Pointers on the ground suggest the southern African nation is firmly on 
track to achieving its worst winter wheat crop, as farmers confess to the 
looming crop failure, which they largely blame on the country’s relentless 
electricity load shedding by power utility, ZESA.
The country’s winter wheat production heavily relies on electricity to power 
irrigation pumps: Any other alternatives such as generators will push costs 
through the roof, rendering the business unprofitable.
The decline in wheat output this year translates to a massive wheat import 
bill for Zim-babwe’s inclusive government whose coffers are already dry.
The government’s target of producing some 75 000 tonnes of wheat on 26 280 
hectares, after injecting US$20 million into winter wheat production, is 
already completely off the mark with figures on the uptake of the loan 
facility being disbursed by CBZ Bank showing that farmers have accessed a 
mere US$664 000.
Ironically, the farmers could not access the loan facility last year because 
the inputs were released way past the May 15 wheat planting deadline for 
most of the regions.
A CBZ official, speaking on condition that he remained unnamed, said: “Most 
farmers are afraid of ZESA’s load shedding antics. They are telling us that 
if they are not assured of constant power supply then there is no point 
taking the risk.”
In April, the Zimba-bwe Farmers Union warned that: “With no electricity 
there is no wheat to talk about lest there is a miracle.”
The decline in wheat production comes at a time when the Food and 
Agricultural Organisation has projected the crop’s second highest record 
global yield of 690 million tonnes for 2012.
Last year, Zimbabwe harvested a paltry 41 000 tonnes on 14 100 hec-tares, 
which hardly satiated the country’s 400 000 to 450 000 tonnes requi-rement 
for wheat, the nation’s second staple crop after maize.
While farmers blame, among a litany of other reasons, ZESA’s incessant power 
outages and poor government funding of agriculture for their failure to 
produce enough wheat to feed the nation, a visit to Norton by The Financial 
Gazette revealed another overlooked dimension to the ever dwindling winter 
wheat crop.
Norton is part of Natural Region II, a 58,600 square-kilometre piece of land 
occupying the country’s Highveld, which stretches into parts of Mashona-land 
East, West and Central provinces.
Classified as an area suitable for intensive crop and livestock production, 
this piece of land is Zimbabwe’s key winter wheat producing area. In 1985, 
according to the Zimbabwe Statistics Office’s 1985 Government Statistical 
Year Book, 74 percent of Natural Region II was occupied by large scale 
commercial farms, 22 percent by communal farmers and four percent by small 
scale commercial farmers.
But the 2000 land reform programme that led to the occupation of large scale 
commercial farms by communal farmers, effectively redefined the agricultural 
pattern of the entire Natural Region II.
The land reform programme remapped the area by bringing in more communal 
farmers (A1) and more commercial farmers (A2) who, unfortunately, were 
under-resourced to continue practicing the intensive crop and livestock 
farming the area had become famous for.
Without the necessary financial and material resources, the majority of 
beneficiaries of both the A1 and A2 model schemes are currently engaged in 
what they know best: subsistence farming, a realm of agriculture that offers 
very little options for wheat production, which currently costs an estimated 
US$1 800 per hectare. 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

New Posts:

From the archives

Posts from our archive you may find interesting