Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Another land invasion case referred to an international court

Another land invasion case referred to an international court

By Alex Bell
21 December 2010

An international tribunal has been appointed to consider the case of a
German farming family in Zimbabwe, whose three farms were illegally invaded
by ZANU PF members in June.

The von Pezold family, who are the largest German investors in Zimbabwe,
were forced to approach the Paris-based International Centre for Settlement
(ICSID) of Investment Disputes in July, after the farms were invaded. At the
time, Germany’s government threatened to cut off all aid to Zimbabwe unless
the reportedly armed and alcohol fuelled ZANU PF mob that invaded the
properties was ordered to leave. The land invaders are said to have looted
maize and other crops valued at more than a million dollars before they left
the farms after a three week long stand off with the von Pezolds.

The ICSID has now appointed a three-member arbitration tribunal to consider
the case filed by the von Pezold family, who are suing the Zimbabwe
government for loss of income and for failing to act against the land
invaders. The properties are meant to be covered by a bilateral investment
promotion and protection agreement between Zimbabwe and Germany, which was
formed in 1995, but which only came into force in 2000. The agreement is
meant to protect all investments by Germans in Zimbabwe, including
agricultural investments, and precludes any farms from ‘expropriation’ under
the land grab campaign.

This will be the second time the Zimbabwe government had been dragged before
the ICSID, after a group of Dutch nationals in April last year won its case
after their farms were invaded. The Dutch farmers argued that their
properties were protected by a BIPPA, under which Zimbabwe promised to pay
full compensation to Dutch nationals in disputes arising out of any
investments in the country. The Dutch group has still not been compensated
despite winning their case in the Paris court last year. They have now
approached an American court seeking an enforcement order, and the court is
reportedly ready to attach Zimbabwean owned properties in the compensation

There have been several attempts to try and force the Zimbabwe government to
compensate farmers who have lost land because of Robert Mugabe’s land grab
scheme, but all court orders, whether domestic or international, are being
blatantly ignored.

Critically, the regional Tribunal which ruled in 2008 that Mugabe’s land
grab was unlawful has been suspended this year, in what critics say is an
attempt to appease Mugabe. The court had ordered the government to
compensate farmers for properties that had been illegally seized and protect
the remaining commercial farming community from new threats. But this order
has been completely ignored and farm invasions have continued unabated,
despite the formation of the unity government.

John Worsley-Worswick from Justice for Agriculture (JAG) explained on
Tuesday that it is important for these rulings to be made, despite the
breakdown of the rule of law in Zimbabwe. He said that while there is a
“total abandonment of the judiciary,” it is just a temporary issue.

“At some stage in the future the judiciary will have to be revamped and
there will be a return to property rights,” Worsley-Worswick said.

The JAG official added that this latest case before the ICSID needs to be
dealt with more comprehensively than the previous Dutch case, saying:
“Compensation claims are now beyond just the value of the land that was
seized.” He explained that the question of what constitutes compensation has
changed in light of a recent ruling this year by a British asylum court. The
court dismissed an asylum application by a confessed land invader, and
stated that the land grab scheme was a crime against humanity.

“This level of illegality should underwrite compensation claims of farmers
and their workers,” Worsley-Worswick said, adding: “Other issues now enter
into this, and these are issues of damages and disturbances losses.”

Worsley-Worswick said that issues of lost income for both farmers and their
works, plus relocation costs, trauma costs and the length of time people
have been waiting for compensation, must be taken into account in future
cases. He added: “It is critical that these rulings are made in
international courts to set the necessary precedent.”


Killer poacher jailed 18 years

Killer poacher jailed 18 years   3/7/2019 The Chronicle Mashudu Netsianda, Senior Court Reporter A POACHER who ganged up with a colleague and fatally attacked a

Read More »

New Posts: