Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Former Campfire director blames rampant poaching on land reform

Former Campfire director blames rampant poaching on land reform

Sunday, 01 May 2011 15:38


REPORTS from independent environmental organisations like the Zimbabwe 
Conservation Task Force (ZCTF) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) clearly 
indicate that the country’s wildlife population continues to dwindle 
Unless some corrective measures are put in place urgently, the country risks 
losing a whole lot more, to the point of some animals becoming extinct.

A drive around Zimbabwe`s  game parks and most remote areas that used to be 
infested with wildlife is not as interesting as it used to be as there is 
evidently no longer as much wildlife to talk about.

So bad is the situation that it has become necessary to reflect on the 
wildlife management stance that the country has adopted for so many years 
and discuss whether it is not about time that it is relooked at and 
reviewed, seeing the strategies are not working.

Through much lobbying and advocacy, the Communal Areas Management Programme 
for Indigenous Resources (Campfire) in Zimbabwe gained much momentum from as 
early as the 80s in its fierce  fight for “sustainable utilisation“ of 
local wildlife resources and the need to grant locals licences to hunt and 
trade in animal products.

This was welcomed by many Zimbabweans, most of who saw it as a chance to 
fully utilise the country`s resources for financial enrichment.

Unfortunately, most appear to have missed the bit about utilising the 
resources in a sustainable manner.

Although the Campfire programmes might genuinely have been positive as it is 
undoubtedly of paramount importance that the indigenous people be 
financially empowered through the locally-based God-given resources, results 
show the prevailing trend has proven to be highly detrimental to the 
livelihood of one the country`s most valuable treasures.

In a one -on- one interview  with The Standard, Steven Kasere, the former 
Campfire director who resigned in 2001 under circumstances he described as 
“political“ had a lot to say about the present state of affairs, as far as 
wildlife management is concerned.

Kasere, who took over the directorship of Campfire in 1999 and became a 
major player in the fight for the sustainable utilisation of the wildlife 
resources in Zimbabwe, expressed great disappointment and concern over the 
rapid deterioration of the country`s wildlife.

“Everywhere I go; people ask me if Campfire still exists. This is a very 
sad situation when considering that it was mainly because of the Campfire 
programme that the downlisting of the elephants from Cites (Convention on 
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) Appendix 
1 to Appendix 2 was granted,“ he said as he reflected on the Campfire`s 
past achievements.

With the rate of wildlife poaching in Zimbabwe, it would appear as though 
Campfire is losing grip of the programmes that it once promoted with so 

This could be because there isn`t much wildlife to talk of anymore.

Kasere blamed the apparent failure of Campfire`s programmes on greed nature, 
which he said had seen so many animals getting killed for financial gain 
without as much as allowing them a chance to regenerate.

Kasere was however quick to point out that failure of the Campfire 
programmes to realise the intended results also had much to do with the land 
reform programme that the government embarked on more than a decade ago.

“The land reform, though necessary, brought about human resource changes 
that had to be accommodated.

Urbanites who were never part of the Campfire structures for management of 
natural resources suddenly became farmers.

“Naturally, they started to cut down trees and kill animals because they had 
no knowledge of other viable land use options other than agriculture,“ he 

`In the former Campfire areas, key personnel that commanded higher natural 
resource posts moved to new resettlement areas, leaving Campfire 
institutions on the ground ineffective.
“So in a way, the land reform was not accompanied by the necessary 
institutional arrangements to save wildlife. Hence a lot of wild animals 
were killed while natural resource institutions collapsed,“ Kasere said.

However, the real issue here is not whether to place the blame on Campfire 
for the leading role that it played in propounding the idea of resource 
utilisation that has now clearly gone out of hand or if the blame should 
instead rest on the government’s land policies that have seen the settlers 
causing unprecedented degradation to the areas they settled in.

What is important is to admit that the wildlife management strategies that 
Zimbabwe has adopted are just not working and to urgently seek to rectify 
the situation, if the country`s wildlife is ever to be saved.


Survival in the wild

Survival in the wild  Sunday Mail 13/10/2019   Phineas Chauke IT is not called wildlife for nothing. Life in the wild is not only survival

Read More »

ZimParks, IFAW in conservation deal

ZimParks, IFAW in conservation deal Herald 3/10/2019   Elita Chikwati and Ellen Chasokela Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZimParks) on Monday signed a Memorandum

Read More »

New Posts: