Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

Commercial Farmers' Union of Zimbabwe

***The views expressed in the articles published on this website DO NOT necessarily express the views of the Commercial Farmers' Union.***

Zimbabwe urged to lift ban on growing genetically modified food

Zimbabwe urged to lift ban on growing genetically modified food

Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00 GMT

By Madalitso Mwando

BULAWAYO, Zimbabwe (AlertNet) – From poultry products to fish, potatoes to 
apples, Johnson Moyo, a primary school teacher in Bulawayo, has come to 
enjoy what many Zimbabweans once considered the finer things in life.

While such foodstuffs might be part of a normal grocery list elsewhere, for 
Moyo and many poorly paid civil servants like him they were luxuries that 
have only recently become affordable for the “average man,” as he puts it.

The reason lies in the provenance of the food: it is imported, and some of 
it is farmed using genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Moyo knows, and he 
doesn’t mind.

“These items are relatively cheap,” Moyo said. “They are keeping my family 

The cheaper alternatives to locally grown food are particularly welcome in a 
country where agricultural mismanagement has combined with drought, believed 
related to climate change, to create chronic food shortages.

Import food wholesalers have sprouted across Zimbabwe’s capital, where items 
such as poultry, long absent from working-class dinner tables, are sold in 
bulk cheaply.

“I have been told some of the chicken and fish we eat comes from Brazil and 
Australia, but it all tastes the same to me,” Moyo said.

While consumers gobble imported GMO products, however, the Zimbabwean 
government remains opposed to local production of genetically modified food, 
even as influential lobbyists pressure it to rethink.

Last month, the Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI) announced it was 
asking the government to allow farmers to plant GMO crops to boost 
agricultural production after a succession of poor harvests.

“We will continue pushing for the embracing of GMO production, using GMO 
technology,” the CZI said in a statement, noting that exporting such food 
would be a starting point.


Zimbabwe has long opposed the production of genetically modified crops, even 
though imported GMO products have flooded supermarkets since the easing of 
stringent import regulations in 2009, when the country suspended the local 

Agriculture minister Joseph Made has said previously that the country will 
not allow farmers to produce GMOs, claiming they contain toxic substances 
that are harmful to consumers’ health and that they are less nutritious than 
organic foods.

The minister’s position has been criticised as flawed since Zimbabwean 
farmers use pesticides and fertiliser, so locally produced food, while 
non-GMO, is not necessarily organic.

However, there remain policy differences within the troubled coalition 
government on this issue, as with others. Science and technology minister 
Heneri Dzinotyiwei said last month that the government was reviewing its 
anti-GMO policy.

According to Dzinotywei, the safety of GMOs has been confirmed by the United 
Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organisation, 
as well as the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and 
Biotechnology, a non-profit research organisation.

But there are fears in the agriculture ministry that the call for relaxing 
the country’s GMO ban could lead to the country being unable to export its 
crops, and could lead to local seed dealers and farmers being pushed from 
the market by foreign GMO producers.

Agriculture Minister Made last year described the idea of investment in 
genetically modified products as an economic blunder, telling state media: 
“If Zimbabwe produces surplus food for export where would you expect us to 
export (it to), with most countries now banning GMO foods?”

Made says the government will invest in providing farmers with fertilisers 
instead of adopting GMO production – even though most countries in the 
world, contrary to his statement, are open to the importation of GMO foods.

Sentiments on GMO crops remain varied and often fuelled by emotion, but the 
Zimbabwe Farmers Union (ZFU), which represents indigenous farmers, says the 
time has come for the government to explore more research on genetically 
modified crops.

“We are aware of other African countries such as Burkina Faso that have 
successfully embraced (genetically modified) production in non-edible crops 
such as cotton. (They) are doing well. Why not us?” said a ZFU official.

For ordinary Zimbabweans who over the years have received food assistance 
from relatives working in neighbouring South Africa, genetically modified 
food already has become part of the daily diet.


Tapuwa Gomo, a Zimbabwean development expert based in South Africa, said 
that adopting genetically modified crops could help farmers grow more food 
with fewer resources.

“Engineering the ability to fix nitrogen into cereal crops could reduce or 
even remove the need for chemical fertilisers and increase yields,” Gomo 

“Zimbabwe must seriously discuss GMO production because, as it stands, it is 
impossible to talk about economic revival without strengthening 
agriculture,” he added.

Opponents of the move to GMOs, however, point out that adopting more 
drought-resistant existing crop varieties or incorporating needed genes 
through traditional breeding could help solve Zimbabwe’s problems without 
the need for genetic modification.

Zimbabwe this year is again appealing for food assistance to feed millions 
of hungry people, having moved from being a food exporter at the turn of the 
millennium to a food importer. The change was triggered by violent land 
seizures that disrupted farming activities and by successive droughts.

“If Zimbabwe is to be self-sustaining, locally driven GM technology could be 
a panacea for the country’s food security problems,” Gomo said.

President Robert Mugabe has in the past tried to ban imports of GMO food 
from South Africa. But when local producers failed to meet demand, the ban 
was quickly lifted, highlighting the tricky choices some African countries 
face in their attempts to promote local food production that has to compete 
with cheaper GMO imports.

For Moyo and other consumers, however, the GMO controversy has more 
straightforward ramifications. As long as locally produced food remains 
expensive, he says, “GMOs are what I will eat.”

Madalitso Mwando is a journalist based in Harare, Zimbabwe. 


New Posts: